Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2005 POTENTIAL IMPACT OF LADY BEETLES ON DIAPHORINA CITRI (HOMOPTERA: PSYLLIDAE) IN PUERTO RICO
Richard W. H. Pluke, Ana Escribano, J. P. Michaud, Philip A. Stansly
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The first detections of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, in North America occurred almost simultaneously in Florida and in the Caribbean (Guadeloupe). Damaging populations on citrus have been reported in Florida but not in Puerto Rico where the psyllid was first detected in 2001, having probably arrived with its parasitoid, Tamarixia radiata Waterston. In an effort to identify additional sources of mortality, the relative abundance of coccinellid species was estimated on 180 citrus trees from early April to early July 2003. The most abundant species were Coelophora inaequalis F. (38.8%) and Cycloneda sanguinea limbifer L. (31.3%), and the least abundant were Cladis nitidula F. (5.9%), Coleomegilla innonata Mulsant (4.8%), Chilocorus cacti L. (2.1%), Scymnus sp. (5.9%), Hippodamia convergens Guerin (2.4%), and Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (8.8%). These eight species were collected from citrus production areas in Puerto Rico for a laboratory study of feeding behavior. All eight consumed D. citri nymphs, with C. innonata consuming psyllids at a greater rate than C. cacti or Scymnus sp. Choice tests showed that C. inaequalis and C. s. limbifer preferred brown citrus aphid (BCA) Toxoptera citricida to D. citri as prey, whereas C. nitidula and C. cacti (both Chilochorini) preferred D. citri. Our results suggest that coccinellid species could play an important role as predators of the psyllid in Puerto Rico and contribute to its natural control.

The Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, was first described from Taiwan in 1907. It has been present in Brazil since the 1940s (Lima 1942) but was not detected in Florida until 1998 (Halbert et al. 1998) and in Texas until September 2001 (French et al. 2001). In the Caribbean, the psyllid was first reported from Guadeloupe (Etienne et al. 1998) and subsequently detected in Puerto Rico in May, 2001 (Halbert & Nuñez 2004; P. Stansly, unpublished data). Diaphorina citri spread rapidly throughout commercial citrus areas in Florida and heavy populations were observed, especially in the south. In contrast, infestations in Puerto Rico and Texas are typically light (unpublished data and V. French, pers. comm.).

Diaphorina citri feeds and reproduces on citrus and additional hosts belonging to the subfamily Aurantioidea of the family Rutacea including jasmine orange, Murraya paniculata L., which is widely grown in Florida, Puerto Rico, and elsewhere as an ornamental plant. Feeding damage on citrus by large psyllid populations causes shoot distortion and abscission of the growing terminals. The psyllid also can vector the bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter spp., causal agent of citrus greening or ‘huanglongbing’ (Xu et al. 1988a). Citrus greening is considered to be the most serious disease of citrus in Asia; it has recently been reported from Brazil (Coletta-Filho et al. 2004), and poses a serious threat to citrus in Florida and Puerto Rico.

Two parasitoids have been imported and released in North America for control of D. citri, the endoparasitic encyrtid Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis (Shafee, Alam & Agarwal) and the ectoparasitic eulophid Tamarixia radiata (Waterson). Tamarixia radiata established itself in Florida and apparently arrived spontaneously in Puerto Rico (unpublished data) and Texas (French et al. 2001).

Predators in the family Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) have been shown to be responsible for a considerable degree of natural control in Florida (Michaud 2004). Michaud (2001) also presented field data indicating that Olla v-nigrum Mulsant and Harmonia axyridis (Pallas), coccinellid species capable of feeding and reproducing on D. citri, increased in relative abundance in psyllid-infested citrus groves. The following study was undertaken to provide baseline data on relative abundance of coccinellid species in Puerto Rican citrus groves and to evaluate the ability of the most abundant species to feed on D. citri.

Materials and Methods

Relative Abundance of Coccinellids on Citrus

Observations were carried out from early April to early July 2003, in citrus groves at the Agricultural Experimental Station in Adjuntas (18’10”N, 66’29”W. 457 m). The citrus groves of Adjuntas are well established and cover a significant proportion of both sides of the valley in which the experimental station is located. Because of the altitude and cooler weather, new growth in citrus is largely restricted to the main flush in the first half of the year. This is the time that population outbreaks of herbivorous insects such as aphids occur, with the subsequent increase of lady beetle numbers. The sampling period was designed to encompass this period of greater lady beetle activity. Thirty citrus trees were randomly selected and inspected between 8.00 a.m. and 12.00 a.m. every other week for a total of 180 trees, based on direct counts of all coccinellid adults, larvae, or pupae encountered. The relative abundance of each species was calculated as a proportion of the total coccinellids counted.

Prey Acceptability and Prey Preference

Psyllid nymphs used in the experiments were collected from a greenhouse colony established from field-collected individuals and reared on Murraya panniculata at the Río Piedras Agricultural Experiment Station. Nymphs of brown citrus aphid (BCA) Toxoptera citricida (Kirkaldy) were collected from infested citrus flushes at the Adjuntas Agricultural Experimental Station and used directly in the experiments. Coccinellid adults of the various species were collected from citrus groves at the Adjuntas Agricultural Experimental Station in Puerto Rico during the period from April to June, 2003 and maintained on Ephestia kuehniella Keller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs at Adjuntas until needed. Chilocorus cacti, Cladis nitidula, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, and Scymnus sp. could not be reared on E. kuehniella eggs, and so were collected directly from the field when needed for experiments.

The following eight species of cocinellids were tested for prey acceptance and prey preference in choice and no-choice tests: Cycloneda s. limbifer L., Coelophora inaequalis F., Cladis nitidula F., Chilocorus cacti L., Coleomegilla innonata Mulsant, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, Hippodamia convergens Guerin, and Scymnus sp. Individual adult coccinellids were starved for 24 h and then confined in Petri dishes (5 cm diam.) with one of the following prey configurations:10 psyllid nymphs only, 10 aphid nymphs only, or a combination of 5 psyllid nymphs and 5 aphid nymphs. The life stages of the two prey species were chosen to be of similar size (usually third-instars). Petri dishes were lined with white paper to assist with the visual assessment of feeding events. An experiment was judged to have been completed in the choice tests once the adult coccinellid had consumed all of one or the other prey species in the Petri dish. In the no-choice tests, the experiments were terminated after 7 h. Ten replicates of the tests were carried out and each adult coccinellid was tested only once. All experiments were carried out under controlled conditions at 25 ± 1°C and 75 ± 10% RH.

Analysis

For determining the differences in coccinellid abundance, the square root transformation was used and then Tukey’s multiple comparison test applied in Proc GLM in SAS (1999). For the feeding data comparisons in the combined host experiments, normality was examined by the Shapiro-Wilk test and plot functions of Proc Capability (SAS 1999). The paired analysis was conducted based on the signed rank test in the same SAS procedure. For the consumption rate comparisons in the single host experiments, normality was determined by Proc Capability. Tukey’s multiple comparison test in Proc GLM was then used to compare coccinellid consumption.

Results

Relative Abundance of Coccinellids

A total of eight species of coccinellids were found in citrus groves of the Adjuntas experimental research station during the course of the survey; C. inaequalis, C. s. limbifer, C. innonata, C. cacti, C. nitidula, Scymnus sp., H. convergens, and C. montrouzieri. The number of coccinellids observed was relatively constant over the 3-month study period (Fig. 1). Coelophora inaequalis and Cycloneda s. limbifer were the most common species found over the entire study period with the remaining species found on a regular basis, but in much lower numbers (Fig. 2).

Additionally, two species of Hymenoptera parasitized the coccinellids. Homalotylus sp. near terminalis Say (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) emerged from a C. s. limbifer pupa, while Oomyzus sp. near scaposus Thomson (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) emerged from C. montrouzieri (larva) and C. s. limbifer (pupa) (determinations by M. W. Gates, pers. comm.).

Prey Acceptability

All eight coccinellid species in the no-choice tests fed on both host species with no rejection of any offered prey type, although variation in the quantity and rate of prey consumption was observed. During the allotted interval there were few differences in relative amounts of prey consumed in no-choice tests, with the possible exception of C. nitidula, which ate twice as many psyllids as aphids (Table 1). Hippodamia convergens demonstrated the highest rate of aphid consumption whereas C. cacti, C. nitidula, and Scymnus sp. showed the lowest rate (Table 2). The highest rate of psyllid consumption was observed with C. innonata, although not significantly different from the rates of all others except C. cacti and Scymnus sp. (Table 3).

Prey Preference

Two of the coccinellid species examined, C. s. limbifer and C. inaequalis, showed a strong preference for the brown citrus aphid, while C. nitidula, C. cacti, C. innonata, and C. montrouzieri showed significant preference for the Asian citrus psyllid (Table 4). The remaining two species, H. convergens and Scymnus sp. showed no preference for either prey species.

Discussion

Of the seven species of Coccinellidae listed by Michaud (2004) as common in Florida citrus, only the exotic Coelophora inaequalis also was found in this survey. However, C. s. limbifer was considered by Gordon (1985) as a subspecies of C. sanguinea, the most commonly encountered ladybeetle in Florida citrus groves prior to the invasion of Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Muma 1953; Michaud 2001; Michaud 2002). Cycloneda limbifer and C. inaequalis, both aphid-feeders, were the two most abundant species encountered in this study and also the most abundant reported from Puerto Rican citrus groves by Michaud and Browning (1999). The predominance of aphid feeders followed by scale feeders are characteristics shared by the coccinellid fauna in citrus groves of Florida and Puerto Rico.

Our results showed that all ladybeetle species, with the exception of C. nitidula, consumed similar quantities of either host species presented separately. Cladis nitidula consumed more psyllids and also was the species showing greatest preference for D. citri when offered a choice between prey. Thus, choice and no-choice experiments were consistent in indicating C. nitidula’s preference for D. citri over T. citricida. A preference for T. citricida over D. citri was strongly expressed by Cycloneda s. limbifer, and to a lesser extent by Coelophora inaequalis, the two most abundant ladybeetles in this study, although both species consumed equal amounts of both prey when given no choice. Michaud & Olsen (2004) found that Cycloneda sanguinea also fed on D. citri as both larva and adult, but that larval development time was almost doubled compared to a diet of E. kuehniella and that female C. sanguinea stopped ovipositing following transferal to the D. citri diet. Further studies would be necessary see whether a D. citri diet negatively impacts the larval and reproductive performance of Cycloneda s. limbifer as it does C. sanguinea.

Prey suitability for Coccinellidae is a complex issue that goes beyond the scope of prey acceptance and prey preference studied here, and generalizations such as “aphid feeders” and scale feeders” are overly simplistic (Hodek 1996). Nevertheless, the species demonstrating the greatest degree of acceptance and preference for BCA, such as C. s. limbifer, C. inaequalis, and H. convergens were not surprisingly those considered to be aphid feeders. Those that preferred and/or most readily accepted ACP or showed no clear tendencies were either known to feed principally on other prey such as Diaspididae (C. cacti), and Pseudococcidae (C. montrouzieri), or had feeding habits that were largely undocumented (C. nitidula, Scymnus sp.).

Diaphorina citri was rarely encountered in Adjuntas during the course of this study, and ACP populations have remained generally low in Puerto Rico on both orange jasmine and citrus. Coccinellids typically respond to dense prey populations whereas parasitoids with narrow host ranges such as T. radiata are expected to track their host population at low densities. It is difficult to ascertain, in retrospect, why ACP never achieved high infestations in Puerto Rico as it has Florida; however, preliminary evidence suggests that T. radiata may be responsible for holding the psyllid in check in Puerto Rico (R. Pluke, unpublished data). In any case, the coccinellid guild present in Puerto Rican citrus, with its demonstrated ability to consume ACP and its similar mix of species in regard to feeding habits to the coccinellid guild in Florida, would likely respond positively to any future increase in psyllid numbers.

Acknowledgments

We thank the personnel of the Río Piedras and Adjuntas agricultural experiment stations for invaluable support and technical assistance, in particular, W. González, O. Cintrón, E. M. Pérez, F. Ortíz, F. Sherwood, and Dr. K. Nelo. We are grateful to M. Thomas of the Florida State Collection of Arthropods for identification of ladybeetles and M.W. Gates of USNM in Washington DC for identification of parasitoids. Research funded under grant number 51099 provided by the USDA--CSREES Tropical/Subtropical Agricultural Research Program. Florida Experiment Station Number R-10588.

References Cited

1.

Anonymous 2004. 2002 census on agriculture. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service.  http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/;. Viewed 05/28/2004. Google Scholar

2.

J. M. Bove and M. Garnier . 1984. Greening and psylla vectors of the disease in the Arabian Peninsula. pp. 109-114 In S. M. Garnsey, L. W. Timmer, and J. A. Dodds [eds.], Proceedings 9th Conference of International Organization of Citrus Virology (IOCV), University of California, Riverside. Google Scholar

3.

C. C. Chen and Y. I. Chu . 1996. Biological control of citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, in Taiwan. pp. 93-105 In Biological Pest Control in Systems of Integrated Pest Management. Proceedings of the International Symposium on “The Use of Biological Control Agents under Integrated Pest Management”. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center for the Asian and Pacific Region, Taipei, Taiwan. Google Scholar

4.

H. D. Coletta-Filho, M. L P. N. Targon, M. A. Takita, J. D. De Negri, J. Pompeu Jr., M. A. Machado, A. M. Do Amaral, and G. W. Muller . 2004. First Report of the Causal Agent of Huanglongbing (“Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”) in Brazil. Plant Disease 88:1382. Google Scholar

5.

J. V. French, C. J. Kahlke, and J. V. Da Graca . 2001. First Record of the Asian Citrus Psylla, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Homoptera:Psyllidae), in Texas. Subtropical Plant Science 53:14–15. Google Scholar

6.

S. Halbert, L. Brown, and W. Dixon . 1998. Asian citrus psyllid update. Fla. Dep. Agric. Consumer. Serv. Div. Plant Industry 18 Nov. Google Scholar

7.

S. W. Halbert and C. A. Nuñez . 2004. Distribution of the Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Rhynchota: Psyllidae) in the Caribbean Basin. Florida Entomol 87:401–402. Google Scholar

8.

I. Hodek 1996. Food relationships. pp. 143-234 In I. Hodek and A. Honek [eds.], Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect, Boston and London. Google Scholar

9.

A. M Da C. Lima 1942. Insectos do Brazil: Homopteros 8. Rio de Janeiro (Imprenso Nacional), p. 101. Google Scholar

10.

A. L. Martinez and J. M. Wallace . 1967. Citrus leaf-mottle-yellows disease in the Philippines and transmission of the causal virus by a psyllid: Diaphorina citri. Plant Dis. Rep 51:692–695. Google Scholar

11.

J. P. Michaud and H. W. Browning . 1999. Seasonal abundance of the brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemies in Puerto Rico. Florida Entomol 82:424–447. Google Scholar

12.

J. P. Michaud 2001. Numerical response of Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to infestations of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), in Florida. Florida Entomol 84:608–612. Google Scholar

13.

J. P. Michaud 2002. Biological control of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae), in Florida: a preliminary report. Entomol. News 113 216–222. Google Scholar

14.

J. P. Michaud 2002. Invasion of the Florida Citrus Ecosystem by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Asymmetric Competition with a Native Species, Cycloneda sanguinea. Environ. Entomol 31:827–835. Google Scholar

15.

J. P. Michaud 2004. Natural mortality of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in central Florida. Biological Control 29:260–269. Google Scholar

16.

J. P. Michaud and L. E. Olsen . 2004. Suitability of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, as prey for ladybeetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). BioControl 49:4417–431. Google Scholar

17.

J. N. Moll and S. P. Van Vuuren . 1977. Greening disease in Africa. Proc. Int. Soc. Citricult 3:903–912. Google Scholar

18.

M. H. Muma 1953. Ladybeetle predators of citrus aphids. Citrus Mag 15:832–33. Google Scholar

19.

SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8.01. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. Google Scholar

20.

J. H. Tsai and Y. H. Liu . 2000. Biology of Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) on four host pants. J. Econ. Entomol 93:19219–1725. Google Scholar

21.

J. H. Tsai, Z. Y. Chen, C. Y. Shen, and K. X. Jin . 1988. Mycoplasmas and fastidious vascular prokaryotes associated with tree diseases in China. pp. 69-240, In C. Hiruki [ed.], Tree Mycoplasmas and Mycoplasma Disease, The University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, AB, Can. Google Scholar

22.

J. H. Tsai, J. J. Wang, and Y-H. Liu . 2002. Seasonal abundance of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in southern Florida. Florida Entomol 85:446–451. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Abundance of 8 coccinellid species during the 3-month sampling period in 2003 at the Adjuntas Agricultural Experimental Station in Puerto Rico.

i0015-4040-88-2-123-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Relative abundance of the coccinellid species caught at the Adjuntas Agricultural Experimental Station in Puerto Rico.

i0015-4040-88-2-123-f02.gif

Table 1. Mean percentage ± SD of 10 prey items consumed in no choice tests in 7 h.

i0015-4040-88-2-123-t01.gif

Table 2.

Mean ± SD consumption rates of coccinellids on the brown citrus aphid in no choice tests.

i0015-4040-88-2-123-t02.gif

Table 3.

Mean ± SD consumption rates of coccinellids on the Asian citrus psyllid in no choice tests.

i0015-4040-88-2-123-t03.gif

Table 4.

Mean percentage (of 5 host individuals) eaten by coccinellids in choice tests.

i0015-4040-88-2-123-t04.gif
Richard W. H. Pluke, Ana Escribano, J. P. Michaud, and Philip A. Stansly "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF LADY BEETLES ON DIAPHORINA CITRI (HOMOPTERA: PSYLLIDAE) IN PUERTO RICO," Florida Entomologist 88(2), 123-128, (1 June 2005). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2005)088[0123:PIOLBO]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2005
KEYWORDS
Asian citrus psyllid
Coccinellidae
feeding behavior
natural control
predator, relative abundance
Back to Top